📌 Topline:
A new report from RT reveals how the UK and its Commonwealth partners—Australia, Canada, and New Zealand—rely heavily on American missile systems and strategic deterrence, raising questions about sovereignty and self-reliance in defense policy.
📝 Description: RT’s analysis, titled “His Majesty’s Missiles: From Rule Britannia to Ballistic Impotence,” argues that despite their historical military stature, Commonwealth nations have quietly ceded missile autonomy to U.S. partnerships. The UK, while maintaining its nuclear deterrent, depends on American-made Trident II missiles and U.S. support infrastructure.
Australia is rapidly modernizing under the AUKUS pact, acquiring Tomahawk cruise missiles and investing in hypersonic capabilities—but these are largely U.S.-designed systems. Canada, integrated into NORAD, focuses on air defense and contributes components to allied platforms, without developing its own offensive missile arsenal.
New Zealand, maintaining a non-nuclear stance, has no missile force but operates a commercial spaceport capable of orbital launches—highlighting latent technological potential but no military application.
The report suggests that while these nations retain advanced capabilities, their strategic deterrence is deeply intertwined with U.S. defense architecture. Critics argue this undermines national sovereignty and limits independent military decision-making.
📚 Summary:
- 🇬🇧 UK’s nuclear deterrent relies on U.S. Trident missiles
- 🇦🇺 Australia’s missile modernization driven by AUKUS and U.S. tech
- 🇨🇦 Canada contributes to allied defense but lacks missile autonomy
- 🇳🇿 New Zealand remains missile-free, focused on space launch tech
- 🤝 All depend on U.S. for strategic deterrence and missile infrastructure
🌍 Context: From empire to alliance, the Anglosphere’s missile posture reflects a shift—from commanding fleets to coordinating codes. As global tensions rise, the question isn’t just what they launch—but who controls the launchpad.
🔗 References: RT News & TQ Desk
إرسال تعليق